Hull City owner Acun Ilicali has insisted his club will take legal action if they lose to Middlesbrough in Saturday’s play-off final.
Hull had been set to face Southampton until the beginning of this week, when the EFL’s case against Tonda Eckert’s side over ‘spygate’ prompted a late change of opponents.
This came as a result of Daily Mail Sport’s reporting that Saints had sent a junior analyst intern to watch Middlesbrough’s training 48 hours before their meeting in the semi-final first leg.
Middlesbrough – beaten 2-1 by Saints in the semi-final before the south-coast club admitted spying on them – were subsequently reinstated on Tuesday.
Saints’ appeal against the decision was dismissed on Wednesday, leaving the Tigers with just two days to train knowing with certainty who they would face.
‘Our legal team says we have to take action, that’s for sure,’ Ilicali told BBC Radio Humberside outside Wembley Stadium before kick-off.
Hull City owner Acun Ilicali has insisted the club will take legal action if they lose to Middlesbrough in Saturday’s play-off final
Tonda Eckert’s Southampton side were expelled from the play-offs on Tuesday, but the club have appealed against the decision
Ilicali described the decision to allow Middlesbrough to qualify straight into the final as ‘unbelievable’, suggesting that seventh-placed Wrexham, who just missed out on a play-off place, should have faced them in a semi-final first.
He said: ‘If this action was so big that a team is out of the play-offs, why didn’t they let them not play the semi-final, investigate, and take Southampton out and put Wrexham in?
‘Why is Wrexham out now? Put Wrexham in and continue the competition.
‘For me, an eliminated team being put back – also our lawyers say this, and that’s their opinion too – is an incredibly wrong decision.’
The 56-year-old, who took over Hull City in 2022, said he did not want to discuss the outcome of the EFL’s independent disciplinary commission hearing before the day of the final to avoid distracting the players.
‘Now I can talk a little more because the boys are in the stadium and they will not hear me. I didn’t want to disturb their focus,’ he added.
‘Decisions are disputable, from what I understand from our lawyers, very disputable.
‘But of course we have to focus on the game, and the boys are tough enough to overcome these difficulties.’
Earlier this week, Ilicali confirmed that the club’s lawyers were investigating whether they would be able to have the play-off final cancelled, with a view to earning automatic promotion to the Premier League.
The FA have since opened an investigation of their own into Southampton, after Saints also admitted to spying on two other rivals’ training sessions, including Oxford United in December and Ipswich Town last month.
The club accepted what happened was ‘wrong’ and apologised to the other clubs involved, as well as Southampton’s supporters.
After their appeal was rejected, the club said in a statement: ‘While we fully acknowledge the seriousness of this matter and the scrutiny that has followed, the club has consistently believed the original sporting sanction was disproportionate – a view that has been widely shared by many in the football community.’
And while Middlesbrough boss Kim Hellberg said he trusted that the ‘right thing’ had been done, Hull boss Sergej Jakirovic said his side were ‘collateral damage’.
‘We can say everything is unfair in this last two weeks. You don’t know what’s going on,’ he told BBC Radio Humberside.
Read More
Inside the mind of ‘control freak’ Southampton boss Eckert: Spygate villain’s obsession with rivals
‘From Middlesbrough’s point of view, they knew that if they were successful, they would play against us, so I could turn the situation around, but I will not do that. We will try to beat them on the pitch.’
On Friday, a member of the independent commission – who made one appearance for Middlesbrough – denied accusations of bias.
‘The suggestion that a single appearance for Middlesbrough Football Club more than three decades ago could in any way influence my judgment as a member of an independent disciplinary commission is wholly without foundation,’ former footballer-turned-solicitor David Winnie told PA.
‘My involvement with the club consisted of one professional appearance approximately 33 years ago and has no bearing whatsoever on my ability to approach these proceedings impartially and objectively.’
