14.3 C
London
Saturday, May 9, 2026

Bill and Hillary Clinton refuse to testify on Epstein in shock letter

Bill and Hillary Clinton have declared themselves above the law as they refused to testify before Congress on Jeffrey Epstein.

The ex-president was scheduled to testify at a closed-door deposition in the House Oversight Committee’s bipartisan investigation into Epstein at 10am Tuesday but failed to show. Hillary was slated to appear on Wednesday.

House Oversight’s Republican chair James Comer promised to bring contempt proceedings next week, setting off a potentially protracted and politically fraught legal battle that would be the first time in history a former president has been held in contempt by Congress. 

In an astonishing letter to Comer, the Clintons launched a broadside at Donald Trump and the Republican lawmakers carrying out his ‘cruel agenda.’

They claimed a legal analysis proved they were not required to testify and insisted the subpoenas were an extension of Trump’s ‘weaponization’ of the law. 

‘The Justice Department has been used as a weapon, at the direction of the President, to pursue political opponents. And most recently and searingly, an ICE agent killed an unarmed mother only days ago,’ the Clintons wrote.

‘Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences. For us, now is that time.’

The Clintons cited precedent set by Trump in October 2022, when he defied a congressional subpoena demanding his testimony over the Capitol riot. 

Former president Bill Clinton and a woman are seen in this newly released image from the Epstein estate

Former president Bill Clinton (R) and former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton arrive at inauguration ceremonies swearing in Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States on the West front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., January 20, 2017

Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell grinning with Bill Clinton during a VIP tour of the White House

Can Congress force a president to testify? 

Key to the Clintons is the distinction between sitting and former presidents.

Sitting presidents

No sitting president has ever been successfully forced by a congressional subpoena to provide live testimony.

DOJ argues sitting presidents have ‘absolute testimonial immunity’ to prevent Congress from using subpoenas to interfere with the Executive Branch.

When Richard Nixon was subpoenaed by Congress for the Watergate tapes in 1974, he was a sitting president. He was forced to turn over documents because of a criminal trial, but he never gave live testimony to Congress.

Former presidents

The legal protection is weaker but still intensely debated.

The Supreme Court ruled in Nixon v. GSA that ex-presidents retain some ‘executive privilege’ over their past communications, but they do not have the same immunity as a sitting president.

Refusal: Harry Truman (1953)

Truman was subpoenaed as a former president by the House Un-American Activities Committee over claims he appointed a Russian spy to the IMF despite FBI warnings.

He refused to show up, claiming that if Congress could grill ex-presidents, it would ruin the independence of the office. Congress didn’t enforce the subpoena.

Refusal: Donald Trump (2022)

Trump was subpoenaed as an ex president by the Jan. 6 Committee. He sued to block it. The committee eventually withdrew the subpoena.

Compliance: John Tyler (1846)

Tyler was subpoenaed as a former president in a House investigation over the ‘misuse of secret service funds’ by his Secretary of State. Tyler appeared before two separate select committees to testify. 

Why this matters for the Clintons

The Clintons argue that since Trump was allowed to ignore a subpoena in 2022, the same rules must apply to them.

In their letter, they accused Comer of trying to ‘punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends.’

<!- – ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/fr/news/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 – ->

Advertisement

‘A legal analysis prepared by two law firms and provided to you yesterday makes clear your subpoenas are legally invalid,’ the Clintons wrote.

‘You claim your subpoenas are inviolate when they are used against us yet were silent when the sitting President took the same position, as a former president, barely more than three years ago.

‘We call on you to release that analysis to the public to allow them to see how this is yet another example of the casual disregard of the law of the land.

‘All the while, you have done nothing with your oversight capacity to force the Department of Justice to follow the law and release all its Epstein files, including any material regarding us as we have publicly called for.’

Only three former presidents, Trump, Harry Truman and John Tyler, and one sitting president, Richard Nixon, have been formally subpoenaed by Congress to testify. Trump, Truman and Nixon all refused to comply, while Tyler appeared voluntarily.

The Supreme Court has never definitively ruled on whether a president can be compelled to give testimony to Congress, though the DOJ has historically argued that presidents have ‘testimonial immunity’ to protect the separation of powers. 

By relying on the precedent set by Trump, the Clintons are testing whether the courts will treat ex-presidents as a special class above ordinary private citizens. 

Contempt of Congress has taken on greater weight in recent years.

Two Trump allies, Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, were both sentenced to four months in federal prison for defying subpoenas from the January 6 Committee.

Bannon was jailed for refusing to provide testimony as a private citizen, while Navarro failed in his attempt to claim ‘executive privilege’ without a formal invocation from the president.

Both men actually served their sentences, underscoring that defiance can carry real legal consequences. The charge is a misdemeanor punishable by up to one year in prison and fines of up to $100,000. 

Comer told reporters: ‘As a result of Bill Clinton not showing up for his lawful subpoena, which was voted unanimously by the committee in a bipartisan manner, we will move next week … to hold former President Clinton in contempt of Congress.’

Clinton has never been accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein but had a well-documented friendship with the financier throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. 

Republicans have zeroed in on that relationship as they try to wrestle control over demands for a full accounting of Epstein’s wrongdoing, amid pressure on Trump.

Epstein, once a friend of Trump, was convicted of sex crimes and later jailed pending trial for allegedly trafficking underage girls.

The financier died in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial, a death officially ruled a suicide but long the subject of conspiracy theories amplified by Trump’s supporters.

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) (C) shows a notebook of questions he said he was prepared to ask former President Bill Clinton after Clinton did not appear for a closed-door deposition in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill on Tuesday

House Oversight and Government Reform Committee member Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) (R) carries a copy of the painting

Bill Clinton was pictured hanging out in a hot tub in the latest tranche of Epstein files released by Congress

Clinton and the pedophile financer have been pictured together multiple times in the latest tranche of Epstein files released by Congress

A painting of Bill Clinton dressed as a woman that Jeffrey Epstein kept at his home

The Clintons were subpoenaed in August alongside other current and former officials, including former FBI director James Comey. 

Their depositions were initially scheduled for October, then delayed twice – once after Bill Clinton said he needed to attend a funeral.

Clinton’s spokesman Angel Urena has accused Comer of singling out the former president, saying his legal team offered the same terms accepted for other witnesses.

Hillary Clinton’s office has questioned why she was subpoenaed at all, saying the committee had failed to explain the relevance of her testimony.

The dispute comes amid controversy over the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein-related records.

Weeks after a legal deadline to release the Epstein files, the Justice Department has offered up only one percent of the total archive, angering Trump supporters who had expected sweeping disclosures.

Those documents included multiple photographs of Bill Clinton from the early 2000s.

The former president has acknowledged traveling on Epstein’s private plane during Clinton Foundation trips before the financier was charged with any sex crimes, but denies wrongdoing and says he cut ties years before Epstein’s 2006 arrest.

No evidence has emerged implicating either Bill or Hillary Clinton in criminal conduct related to Epstein.

Bill and Hillary’s full letter:

WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON

HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON

January 13, 2026

Chairman Comer,

We want to take a moment, given everything, to address you directly.

This past year has seen our Government engage in unprecedented acts, including against our own citizens. People have been seized by masked federal agents from their homes, their workplaces, and the streets of their communities. Students and scientists with visas permitting them to study and work here have been deported without due process. The people who laid siege to the U.S. Capitol have been pardoned and called heroes. Agencies vital to the country’s national security have been dismantled. Universities, media companies, and law firms have been subjected to threats to their funding, access, and licensing unless they made concessions and surrendered their right to constitutionally protected free speech. American troops have been deployed on the streets of our towns and cities. The Justice Department has been used as a weapon, at the direction of the President, to pursue political opponents. And most recently and searingly, an ICE agent killed an unarmed mother only days ago.

Every person has to decide when they have seen or had enough and are ready to fight for this country, its principles and its people, no matter the consequences.

For us, now is that time.

We are lucky by virtue of the positions we held, and the protections afforded by them. But we are not blind. Every day we see the country we have dedicated our lives to improving take step after step after step backwards.

As chairman of this powerful congressional committee, you have immense power to target anyone and subject them to closed door interrogation and more. The decisions you have made, and the priorities you have set as chairman regarding the Epstein investigation, have prevented progress in discovering the facts about the government’s role.

The facts speak for themselves: You subpoenaed eight people in addition to us. You dismissed seven of those eight without any of them saying a single word to you. You made no attempt to force them to appear. In fact, since you started your investigation last year, you have interviewed a total of two people. Two.

A legal analysis prepared by two law firms and provided to you yesterday makes clear your subpoenas are legally invalid. You claim your subpoenas are inviolate when they are used against us yet were silent when the sitting President took the same position, as a former president, barely more than three years ago. We call on you to release that analysis to the public to allow them to see how this is yet another example of the casual disregard of the law of the land. All the while, you have done nothing with your oversight capacity to force the Department of Justice to follow the law and release all its Epstein files, including any material regarding us as we have publicly called for.

Over the last year in the House, extending health care for Americans in any state succeeded only because enough Republicans joined with Democrats. The fact that the public and we are seeing any of the Department of Justice’s Epstein files is only because four Republicans, out of 220, joined every Democrat to reach the minimum number of Members to force a vote. You were not one of those four. Even now, despite the Department of Justice’s failure to follow the law the Congress passed, you have chosen not to consider subpoenaing the sitting Attorney General to follow the law.

Despite everything that needs to be done to help our country, you are on the cusp of bringing Congress to a halt to pursue a rarely used process literally designed to result in our imprisonment. This is not the way out of America’s ills, and we will forcefully defend ourselves.

Indeed, bringing the Republicans’ cruel agenda to a standstill while you work harder to pass a contempt charge against us than you have done on your investigation this past year would be our contribution to fighting the madness.

We have tried to give you the little information we have. We’ve done so because Mr. Epstein’s crimes were horrific. If the Government didn’t do all it could to investigate and prosecute these crimes, for whatever reason, that should be the focus of your work to learn why and to prevent that from happening ever again. There is no evidence that you are doing so. Instead, you have forced the victims to relive their painful experiences, while doing little to give them and everybody else what’s deserved: truth and justice. There is no plausible explanation for what you are doing other than partisan politics.

You accepted the least from those who know the most but demand the most from those who know the least. To say you can’t complete your work without speaking to us is simply bizarre.

You have asked what we know. To answer your inquiry, we are providing you with the same or more than seven of the other eight individuals you subpoenaed regarding the handling of the Epstein investigations and prosecutions, which may be why you have not publicly released their written statements.

We expect you will say it is not enough. We expect you’ll reject it. You may even set out an empty chair or stand in front of the cameras and outright dismiss what we have provided. We expect you will direct your committee to seek to hold us in contempt. You may even release irrelevant, decades-old photos that you hope will embarrass us. You will say your caucus, and the Speaker and the President are behind you 100%. We hope, perhaps in vain, that they will not allow you to singlehandedly hijack the Congress by unilaterally making this decision for your colleagues, your party, and our country.

You will say it is not our decision to make. But we have made it. Now you have to make yours.

We are prepared to make our case to your 45 committee members, and if need be, more. Importantly, we also will defend ourselves in the public arena and ensure this country knows exactly what you are doing and why you are doing so, instead of helping the American people who need this Congress’s work and protection.

For most people, maybe even the bulk of the Congress, today will be the first they learn of this dispute. We are confident that any reasonable person in or out of Congress will see, based on everything we release, that what you are doing is trying to punish those who you see as your enemies and to protect those you think are your friends.

Continue to mislead Americans about what is truly at stake, and you will learn that Americans are better at finding the truth than you are at burying it. Continue to pursue autopens instead of penning laws Americans need, and you will learn that you are signing away any remaining chance of being on the right side of history.

Continue to abet the dismantling of America, and you will learn that it takes more than a wrecking ball to demolish what Americans have built over 250 years.

Sincerely,

Bill Clinton

Hillary Clinton

Hot this week

Diana’s ex-hairdresser condemns ‘evil’ comments about Kate’s hair

Princess Diana's former hairdresser has condemned 'nasty' comments made about the Princess of Wales 's hair - as she stepped out with her newly blonde tresses.

The unusual breakfast request Princess Lilibet asks Meghan Markle for

Meghan Markle revealed her children's favourite meals and that she 'doesn't like baking' on the second season of her lifestyle show With Love, Meghan.

Experts reveal how many tins of tuna is safe to eat a week

The NHS advises people to eat at least two portions of fish a week, yet a recent investigation revealed toxic metals, including mercury, could be lurking in cans of tinned tuna sold in the UK.

Some people DO see ghosts – and medics say there’s an explanation

An astonishing third of people in the UK and almost half of Americans say they believe in ghosts, spirits and other types of paranormal activity.

Prince Philip’s nickname only his nearest and dearest could call him

From 'Lillibet' to 'Grandpa Wales', members of the Royal Family are known to go by many nicknames.

Labour backlash over PM’s election catastrophe grows : RECAP

LIVE: Follow the results and reaction from the UK local elections across England, Scotland and Wales in the biggest test of public opinion since Labour's landslide win in the 2024 general election.

Reeves sister’s ‘row to stop her voting to let Burnham return’

The confrontation - at Ellie Reeves' home during her son's birthday party - was so heated that sister Rachel eventually stormed out, The Mail on Sunday was told.

Christine McGuinness shares a kiss with DJ Roxxxan in her Land Rover

Christine McGuinness 'shared a kiss' with DJ Roxxxan in her Land Rover Defender in London on Saturday. 

Theatre cancels opera after one complaint over cultural insensitivity

The Minack Theatre in Porthcurno has recalled its production of Léo Delibes's Lakmé after Rajan Zed labelled the show as a 'shallow exoticism based on prejudice'.

Tories and Reform must work together to stop crank Left coalition

Reform UK pulverised Labour in its traditional heartlands. It also came second behind Plaid Cymru in Wales and joint-second with Labour in Scotland.

Naval blockade called for after small boats surge from Belgium

Speaking in response to the sudden increase in small boats leaving from Belgium, Christiaan De Ridder said dinghies must not reach French waters.

As many as ten backbench Labour MPs ‘ready to defect to Greens’

The plot would plunge Keir Starmer's leadership into further chaos as he fights to save his job after Labour's poor showing.

Christine McGuinness shares a kiss with DJ Roxxxan in her Land Rover

Christine McGuinness 'shared a kiss' with DJ Roxxxan in her Land Rover Defender in London on Saturday. 
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img