A university has been branded ‘woke’ after students were warned their lectures might contain mentions of chocolate.
A psychology student at the University of Roehampton in south-west London said content warnings were regularly shown before lectures to alert students to any potential sensitive subjects that may arise.
A recent lecture included warnings for ‘smoking, passive smoking’, ‘sexual organs’, ‘anger’ and the ‘quality of parent-child relationships’.
However in one bizarre listing, it also included a content warning for ‘chocolate addiction’.
Second-year student Octavia Evans said rather than being shielded from potential discomfort, she feels she is being infantilised to the point of ‘farce’.
She said: ‘Yes, you read the last one correctly. As a long-suffering chocoholic, I appreciate my lecturers’ concern for my sanity (and waistline), but come on!
‘It made me wonder: had a student actually objected – a voice crying out that discussion of chocolate addiction is too much to endure – would the lecture have been stopped? Or would the university gently remind us that, while it is committed to wellbeing and inclusivity, the material is nonetheless essential? I fear the former.’
A now-deleted section of the university’s website insisted the University was committed to creating a working and learning environment that is truly inclusive’, where everyone feels ‘valued’ and able to ‘achieve their full potential’.
Other trigger warnings warned student that lectures may include ‘reports of friends having mental health difficulties’, or material that ‘might relate to issues you have experienced or about which you hold strong views.’
Another seminar warned that it may include ‘views that you disagree with’, which Ms Evans told The Telegraph was presented as a ‘potential hazard’ rather than a necessary condition of learning.
Roehampton last year ranked 92nd in the woke ranking list published by think tank Civitas in 2023.
It is just the latest woke warning coming from a university in what critics have called an ‘epidemic’.
In December, one of Britain’s top universities warned that Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone features ‘outdated attitudes and abuse’.
Critics said the University of Glasgow’s decision to issue the warning to undergraduates taking a module called British Children’s Literature was proof of a ‘triggering epidemic’.
The University’s warning applied to the module of nine set texts and did not highlight the content of any particular novel.
The University of Sheffield also warned about violence and murder in the Bible, including Christ’s crucifixion.
Bizarrely, the University advises that the four Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John include scenes of ‘graphic bodily injury and sexual violence’ as they relate the events leading up to the death of Jesus.
Christians and historians said the warnings were ‘misguided’, ‘absurd’ and incompatible with discussions about morality.
One warning related to the story of Cain and Abel, the first sons of Adam and Eve. In the Book of Genesis, Cain, the first person to be born, kills his brother, Abel, who becomes the first person to die.
But critics of the censorship pointed out that there is no mention in the Bible of how Cain kills Abel – and were at a complete loss to explain the inclusion of ‘sexual violence’ in the warnings.
Nottingham University slapped a trigger warning on Geoffrey Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales – because they contain ‘expressions of Christian faith’.
The Canterbury Tales, written between 1387 and 1400, is a collection of stories about characters on a pilgrimage from London to the tomb of Saint Thomas Becket at Canterbury Cathedral.
They include the promiscuous Wife of Bath, the drunken miller and the thieving reeve, who delight and shock each other with stories containing explicit references to rape, lust and even anti-Semitism.
However, the university’s warning made no reference to anti-Semitism or sexually explicit themes.
Meanwhile, Biology undergraduates at Reading University were also warned they could see ‘graphic’ images of the human body.
Youngsters were also told they will have to obtain consent before carrying out mock clinical examinations of peers, which ‘involves physical contact through clothing’.
The University of Roehampton has been contacted for comment.
