Keir Starmer has issued a grovelling apology to Jeffrey Epstein’s victims for ‘believing’ Peter Mandelson as he fights to save his premiership amid growing anger at his handling of the scandal.
The Prime Minister said he was sorry as he claimed Mandelson ‘lied’ about the extent of his friendship with the paedophile financier when he was vetted for the US ambassador role.
He also stressed documents about the vetting process will be published ‘as quickly as possible’ – blaming police for delays.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Stay with the Daily Mail throughout today for all the latest updates
Rattled Starmer refuses to discuss his political future
Firstly, let me say I understand their anger and frustration. I am angry and frustrated like them because no one wants to see these deceits in public life. They are angry about his association with Epstein, as am I, they are angry at what he did about the tail end of the last Labour Government.
Starmer attempts to clarify remarks gave in PMQs
I had no reason at that stage to think that was anything other than the truth, and therefore we proceeded. What I learnt in September was that was not the truth. When further emails came to light … and having asked some further questions, including questions about whether Mandelson received gifts, benefits and hospitality, and the nature of the relationship, I sacked Mandelson from the role.
Starmer vows to ‘uphold integrity of public life’
We will uphold the integrity of public life, and we will do everything within our power and in the interests of justice.
To ensure accountability is delivered. That is what the public expects. That is what the victims deserve, and it is what I will do.
Starmer claims Mandelson portrayed Epstein as someone ‘he barely knew’
The information now available makes clear that the answers he gave were lies. He portrayed Epstein as someone he barely knew. And when that became clear, and it was not true, I sacked him.
Starmer: I won’t release Mandelson files for ‘political game’
I understand the strength of public feeling. I share the anger that people feel when powerful individuals appear to escape scrutiny. And I want to be able to release those documents as quickly as possible.
I wanted to release them yesterday, in fact, and to talk about them at Prime Minister’s Questions. But the police have advised that releasing certain information now could risk prejudicing a future investigation or legal process.
And however frustrating from my personal point of view that is, and it is, I will not take any step, however politically tempting, however popular, that risks justice for victims. Because this is not and must never become a political game.
Breaking:Starmer apologises to Epstein victims for ‘believing’ Peter Mandelson
The victims of Epstein have lived with trauma that most of us can barely comprehend. And they’ve had to relive it again and again. They have seen accountability delayed and too often denied. To them, I want to say this. I am sorry. I am sorry for what was done to you. Sorry that so many people failed you.
Sorry for having believed Mandelson’s lies and appointed him. And sorry that even now you’re forced to watch this story unfold in public once again. But I also want to say this. In this country we will not look away, we will not shrug our shoulders and we will not allow the powerful to treat justice as optional.
Breaking:Keir Starmer: None of us knew darkness of Mandelson-Epstein relationship
I entered politics because I wanted to change our country for the better. To make it fairer, safer, more secure.
And I still believe that most people who serve in public life, whether as civil servants or elected politicians, do so for the same reason, because they believe in service. Because they believe in service.
Because they believe in duty. Because they believe in the public good. But that is not why some people do it. And that is not why Mandelson did it.
Starmer news conference under way
Starmer expected to speak shortly
Kemi Badenoch: Mandelson files will expose Government’s ‘terrible decision-making’
I think that those papers are going to show all sorts of terrible decision-making and bad judgment by the Labour Government. I think Keir Starmer is only going to get into more trouble.
Watch: Starmer tells PMQs ‘I regret appointing Lord Mandelson’
Nigel Farage: I want Starmer to remain in Downing Street until May 7
“This is far bigger than the Profumo scandal 60 years ago. This is the biggest scandal in British politics for over one century. And I would predict pretty confidently that Morgan McSweeney, the chief adviser, will be gone pretty quickly.
I don’t know how Starmer will last as Prime Minister. Indeed, I’m very worried about it. I want him to stay forever. When I say forever I mean until May 7, when we have the elections in Wales, Scotland, London and around the rest of the country.



