Keir Starmer has indicated he will carry on as Prime Minister despite growing anger inside his own party at the handling of the Peter Mandelson scandal.
Speaking in Hastings, the Prime Minister immediately addressed the controversy which threatens to engulf his premiership.
In his hastily rewritten speech, he issued a grovelling apology to Jeffrey Epstein’s victims for ‘believing’ Mandelson and insisted the former Labour peer ‘lied’ about the extent of his friendship with the paedophile financier.
The Prime Minister also shared he has been frustrated by police over the release of documents he claims will show Mandelson’s deceit during security vetting for thje US ambassador role.
Appearing rattled during repeated questioning about whether he can remain in Downing Street, Starmer insisted he was elected to ‘change the country’.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Stay with the Daily Mail throughout today for all the latest updates
Starmer vows to review security vetting in wake of Mandelson appointment
There was a due diligence exercise that culminated in questions being asked because I wanted to know the answer to certain issues. That’s why those questions were asked. The answer to those questions were not truthful.
There was then, I should add, security vetting carried out independently by the security services, which is an intensive exercise that gave him clearance for the role, and you have to go through that before you take up the post. Clearly, both the due diligence and the security vetting need to be looked at again.
Starmer: I understand MP’s frustration over Mandelson
Let me say I understand their anger and frustration. I am angry and frustrated like them, because nobody wants to see these deceits in public life. They are angry about his association with Epstein, as am I.
They’re angry about what he did at the tail end of the last Labour government, and frustrated, as am I, that the full information of what was asked and answered when he was appointed can’t be in the public domain.
Watch: Starmer insists no-one knew ‘darkness’ of Mandelson and Epstein’s relationship
Rattled Starmer refuses to discuss his political future
I was elected in on a mandate in 2024 to change the country for the better.
Starmer attempts to clarify remarks gave in PMQs
I had no reason at that stage to think that was anything other than the truth, and therefore we proceeded. What I learnt in September was that was not the truth. When further emails came to light … and having asked some further questions, including questions about whether Mandelson received gifts, benefits and hospitality, and the nature of the relationship, I sacked Mandelson from the role.
Starmer vows to ‘uphold integrity of public life’
We will uphold the integrity of public life, and we will do everything within our power and in the interests of justice.
To ensure accountability is delivered. That is what the public expects. That is what the victims deserve, and it is what I will do.
Starmer claims Mandelson portrayed Epstein as someone ‘he barely knew’
The information now available makes clear that the answers he gave were lies. He portrayed Epstein as someone he barely knew. And when that became clear, and it was not true, I sacked him.
Starmer: I won’t release Mandelson files for ‘political game’
I understand the strength of public feeling. I share the anger that people feel when powerful individuals appear to escape scrutiny. And I want to be able to release those documents as quickly as possible.
I wanted to release them yesterday, in fact, and to talk about them at Prime Minister’s Questions. But the police have advised that releasing certain information now could risk prejudicing a future investigation or legal process.
And however frustrating from my personal point of view that is, and it is, I will not take any step, however politically tempting, however popular, that risks justice for victims. Because this is not and must never become a political game.
Breaking:Starmer apologises to Epstein victims for ‘believing’ Peter Mandelson
The victims of Epstein have lived with trauma that most of us can barely comprehend. And they’ve had to relive it again and again. They have seen accountability delayed and too often denied. To them, I want to say this. I am sorry. I am sorry for what was done to you. Sorry that so many people failed you.
Sorry for having believed Mandelson’s lies and appointed him. And sorry that even now you’re forced to watch this story unfold in public once again. But I also want to say this. In this country we will not look away, we will not shrug our shoulders and we will not allow the powerful to treat justice as optional.
Breaking:Keir Starmer: None of us knew darkness of Mandelson-Epstein relationship
I entered politics because I wanted to change our country for the better. To make it fairer, safer, more secure.
And I still believe that most people who serve in public life, whether as civil servants or elected politicians, do so for the same reason, because they believe in service. Because they believe in service.
Because they believe in duty. Because they believe in the public good. But that is not why some people do it. And that is not why Mandelson did it.



