27.4 C
London
Friday, May 22, 2026

Socially smoking in your twenties could kill you decades later

Socially smoking in your twenties could kill you decades later,

Social smokers damage their lungs just as much as those who go through multiple packs a day, new research has suggested.  

US researchers found current lung cancer screening guidelines miss nearly half of all cases, by focusing on heavy smokers and overlooking those who smoke occasionally over many years. 

The risk of developing the disease may persist for decades after quitting, researchers said, raising concerns that people who only smoked occasionally in their younger years could still face long-term health risks. 

At present, in the US, guidelines typically use pack years to assess a person’s lung cancer risk.     

This is calculated by multiplying the number of cigarette packs smoked per day by the number of years a person has smoked.    

This is based on the assumption that both smoking intensity and duration are equally important when it comes to lung cancer risk. 

However, experts now say this may not be the case and even smoking infrequently over an extended period of time – a phenomenon dubbed ‘social smoking’ – can pose serious health risks. 

Smoking cigarettes is the single biggest risk factor for lung cancer. There are now around 50,200 new cases diagnosed each year in the UK and it is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. 

Even socially smoking can take years off your life, research suggests

Even socially smoking can take years off your life, research suggests 

The study – which will be presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) later this month – analysed data from nearly one million veterans aged 50 to 80-years-old. 

The researchers compared how a person’s risk of developing lung cancer in the next five years changed based on whether they used the standard pack years metric or focused more simply on years smoked. 

They found that measuring how many years someone had smoked for – referred to as tobacco smoking duration – performed at least as well as standard pack-year calculations and, in some cases, flagged more people at risk. 

Crucially, relying on existing screening criteria meant a significant number of cancers would have been missed. 

As it stands, in the US, people who haven’t smoked for 15 years or more are not usually eligible for screening –  regardless of how long they smoked for when they were younger. 

Under these guidelines, roughly one in six cases fell outside screening eligibility. 

But when researchers used smoking duration alone – flagging people who had smoked for around 20 years for example, regardless of how heavily – the proportion of missed cancers dropped to just 7.5 per cent. 

They concluded the findings suggest current guidelines may fail to accurately flag those whose risk builds slowly over time, rather than daily heavy smoking. 

Experts have long known that stopping smoking at any age helps to reduce the risk of cancer, with the most substantial drops in cancer risk coming after the first decade of stubbing out – but risk does not disappear entirely. 

The new study adds to evidence that risk may remain elevated for much longer than current screening cut-offs in some countries account for.

Hazel Cheeseman, chief executive at Action on Smoking and Health, said: ‘This study adds to the growing evidence that even occasional smoking carries serious health risks, including an increased risk of cancer. 

‘That is particularly concerning in England, where we are seeing a rise in the number of people who smoke occasionally rather than every day.

‘Many smokers are cutting down by using vapes, but are not switching completely. 

‘People need to understand that reducing the number of cigarettes they smoke without stopping entirely still poses a substantial risk to health.’

The team added that smoking duration is also easier to measure more reliably than pack years, which depends on people accurately recalling how much they smoked per day over decade. 

For social smokers, the message remains clear: even smoking little and often can increase the very real risk of lung cancer. 

In the UK, anyone aged between 55 and 74 who has ever smoked may be given the opportunity to take part in lung cancer screening, according to the NHS. 

The screening initiative, which began in 2019, is still being rolled out across England, with areas with higher lung cancer rates prioritised. 

Crucially, only those who have informed their GP that they currently smoke or have smoked in the past will be invited. 

Action on Smoking and Health added that all smokers who attend a lung health check should be offered access to high-quality support to help them quit. 

Social smokers damage their lungs just as much as those who go through multiple packs a day, new research has suggested.

Hot this week

Diana’s ex-hairdresser condemns ‘evil’ comments about Kate’s hair

Princess Diana's former hairdresser has condemned 'nasty' comments made about the Princess of Wales 's hair - as she stepped out with her newly blonde tresses.

Experts reveal how many tins of tuna is safe to eat a week

The NHS advises people to eat at least two portions of fish a week, yet a recent investigation revealed toxic metals, including mercury, could be lurking in cans of tinned tuna sold in the UK.

The unusual breakfast request Princess Lilibet asks Meghan Markle for

Meghan Markle revealed her children's favourite meals and that she 'doesn't like baking' on the second season of her lifestyle show With Love, Meghan.

Some people DO see ghosts – and medics say there’s an explanation

An astonishing third of people in the UK and almost half of Americans say they believe in ghosts, spirits and other types of paranormal activity.

The best places to live in Britain’s idyllic national parks

Many of us toy with the idea of moving somewhere close to nature, with a friendly community, where the pace of life is more civilised. But where to find such a place? A national park could be the answer.

Trent Alexander-Arnold is latest player AXED for the World Cup

Thomas Tuchel has confirmed the leak of his England World Cup squad was correct - with a series of big-name stars axed for this summer's trip to the United States.

Ebola outbreak in Congo is ‘spreading rapidly’ and a ‘very high risk’

The head of the World Health Organisation has warned that the Ebola outbreak in Congo is 'spreading rapidly' and now poses a 'very high' risk at the national level.

Ebola outbreak in Congo is ‘spreading rapidly’ and a ‘very high risk’

The head of the World Health Organisation has warned that the Ebola outbreak in Congo is 'spreading rapidly' and now poses a 'very high' risk at the national level.

Eva Longoria joins Gillian Anderson amid Cannes Film Festival

Eva Longoria and Gillian Anderson blew everyone away with their fan inspired gown at The Birthday Party premiere amid the Cannes Film Festival on Friday. 

Venezuela Fury and husband Noah Price enjoy mocktails in Marbella

The daughter of Tyson and Paris Fury, 16, tied the knot with the aspiring boxer, 19, at the Victorian Royal Chapel of St John's on the Isle of Man last weekend.

The glamorous WAGs who will support England’s World Cup squad revealed

England's World Cup squad has been announced - with the likes of Harry Kane, Jude Bellingham, Bukayo Saka and Declan Rice included.

Can’t afford fat jabs? Our experts have the natural alternatives

Social media is awash with 'natural' GLP-1s - cheaper, seemingly more holistic options that mimic effects of the natural GLP-1 appetite hormone.

Truth about peptides… what to know about injections seen as cure-all

It's tough to avoid the current hype about the health benefits of injecting peptides. But do these products actually work, and can people who use them be sure they are safe?
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img